Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Ajeet Rai vs Calum Puttergill Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Rai vs Puttergill analysis and find out who is favored!
Ajeet Rai vs Calum Puttergill Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Rai has won 48.5% of points on his second serve, while Puttergill has won 48.78%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Rai, in recent form, has won 46.22% of his opponent's second serve points, while Puttergill has won 55.24%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.39% and 32.93% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Rai has saved 52.24% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Puttergill has saved 54.79% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Rai has won 46% of matches played (W/L 23/ 27), with Puttergill winning 35.71% (W/L 10/ 18) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Rai has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 16/ 12), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 1/ 1). Puttergill has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 54% (W/L 38/ 33), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Rai has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 53.33% of matches (W/L 16/ 14), where as Puttergill has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 34.62% of matches (W/L 9/ 17). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Rai winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Rai winning 2 and Puttergill winning 1. The last match between Rai and Puttergill was at the Sydney Challenger, 29-10-2023, Q1 round, Hard with Ajeet Rai getting the victory 6-1 2-6 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:56:25.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Rai and Puttergill have played a deciding set 1 times, with Rai winning 1 times and Puttergill 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Rai winning 0, and Puttergill 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Rai has played against opponents with an average rank of 247.26 while Puttergill has played against players with an average rank of 180.82.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Rai has won 44% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Puttergill has won 30% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Rai has converted 39.53% of breakpoint opportunities, and Puttergill has converted 50.85% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Rai 1 - 0 Puttergill
626
Rank
417
High
25
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
880
Rank
663
High
30
Age
R
Plays
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
Form
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
55% (148-119)
Career Total W/L
50% (170-173)
28% (5-13)
YTD W/L
43% (3-4)
$3,445
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Rai VS Puttergill H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Ajeet Rai | Calum Puttergill |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 14 | 10 |
| Aces (Total) | 12 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 7 | 7 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:56:25 | 1:56:25 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (54/89) | 64% (51/80) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 70% (38/54) | 57% (29/51) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 46% (16/35) | 45% (13/29) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 56% (5/9) | 25% (3/12) |
| Return Points W% | 48% (38/80) | 39% (35/89) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Rai VS Puttergill H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 2-6 6-3 |
Stats 
Ajeet Rai
Player
Calum Puttergill
61%
(
54 of
89)
1st Serve %
64%
(
51 of
80)
12
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
7
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
39%
(
35 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
80)
92
Total Points Won
77
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Ajeet Rai | Calum Puttergill |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 28% (5/13) | 43% (3/4) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 32% (13/28) | 50% (9/9) |
| Games Win/Loss | 44% (161/207) | 49% (77/81) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 27% (3/8) | 43% (3/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.58 | 0.39 |
| Aces Total | 103 | 30 |
| DFs per game | 0.21 | 0.31 |
| DFs Total | 38 | 24 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:15:7 | 1:43:2 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 196.67 | 148.14 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (592/973) | 63% (311/496) |
| 1st Serve W% | 68% (404/592) | 64% (200/311) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (182/381) | 49% (90/185) |
| BPs Won% Total | 45% (30/66) | 53% (24/45) |
| Return Pts W% | 35% (325/941) | 42% (217/515) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 33% (3/6) | 43% (3/4) |
| Futures W/L | 29% (2/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 28% (5/18) | 43% (3/7) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 25% (1/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 40% (2/5) | 25% (1/4) |
| 1st set W, W | 67% (6/4) | 75% (4/3) |
| 1st set W, L | 33% (6/2) | 25% (4/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 8% (12/1) | 0% (3/0) |
Ajeet Rai Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Yi Zhou
Player
Ajeet Rai
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve %
58%
(
31 of
53)
3
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
3
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Matija Pecotic
Player
Ajeet Rai
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve %
61%
(
25 of
41)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
58
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Victor Lilov
Player
Ajeet Rai
65%
(
56 of
86)
1st Serve %
53%
(
54 of
102)
3
Aces
16
2
Double Faults
5
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
38%
(
33 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
44 of
102)
97
Total Points Won
91
|
7-6(5) 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ajeet Rai
Player
Viktor Durasovic
65%
(
60 of
93)
1st Serve %
55%
(
51 of
93)
7
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
5
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
35 of
51)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
39%
(
36 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
36 of
93)
93
Total Points Won
93
|
3-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Federico Agustin Gomez
Player
Ajeet Rai
53%
(
28 of
53)
1st Serve %
57%
(
36 of
63)
1
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
1
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
63)
63
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kody Pearson
Player
Ajeet Rai
55%
(
46 of
83)
1st Serve %
63%
(
42 of
67)
6
Aces
5
8
Double Faults
4
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
32 of
42)
49%
(
18 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
33 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
67)
76
Total Points Won
74
|
2-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alex Bolt
Player
Ajeet Rai
74%
(
53 of
72)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
4
Aces
14
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
31 of
39)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
25 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
22 of
64)
69
Total Points Won
67
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ajeet Rai
Player
Thomas Nicholas Gadecki
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
66%
(
37 of
56)
9
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
96%
(
27 of
28)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
8 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Omar Jasika
Player
Ajeet Rai
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve %
70%
(
44 of
63)
0
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
1
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
34%
(
20 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ajeet Rai
Player
Kody Pearson
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve %
59%
(
26 of
44)
5
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
19 of
44)
58
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Calum Puttergill Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Jake Delaney
Player
Calum Puttergill
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve %
54%
(
29 of
54)
8
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
63
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andre Ilagan
Player
Calum Puttergill
70%
(
58 of
83)
1st Serve %
66%
(
62 of
94)
6
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
35 of
62)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
40%
(
33 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
38 of
94)
88
Total Points Won
89
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Calum Puttergill
Player
Moerani Bouzige
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve %
63%
(
43 of
68)
6
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
1
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
30 of
68)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
6-1 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Calum Puttergill
Player
Kokoro Isomura
74%
(
39 of
53)
1st Serve %
68%
(
38 of
56)
4
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mitchell Harper
Player
Calum Puttergill
66%
(
67 of
101)
1st Serve %
58%
(
55 of
95)
3
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
7
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
40 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
43 of
95)
104
Total Points Won
92
|
6-3 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Hiroki Moriya
Player
Calum Puttergill
61%
(
57 of
94)
1st Serve %
62%
(
54 of
87)
3
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
3
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
40%
(
38 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
45 of
87)
101
Total Points Won
80
|
5-7 6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Calum Puttergill
Player
Preston Brown
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve %
46%
(
26 of
56)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ji Sung Nam
Player
Calum Puttergill
59%
(
41 of
70)
1st Serve %
63%
(
54 of
86)
8
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
21 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
44 of
86)
93
Total Points Won
63
|
4-6 6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Calum Puttergill
Player
Kazuki Nishiwaki
57%
(
38 of
67)
1st Serve %
62%
(
45 of
73)
2
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
4
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
25 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
73)
76
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ajeet Rai
Player
Calum Puttergill
61%
(
54 of
89)
1st Serve %
64%
(
51 of
80)
12
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
7
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
39%
(
35 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
80)
92
Total Points Won
77
|
6-1 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Rai Vs Puttergill Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
